USPTO serial 86029771
YEEZY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YEEZY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
BRAD D. ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN LLP7 TIMES SQ FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10036-6569UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Record production; music production; audio recording and production; videotape production; motion picture song production; production of video discs for others; recording studios; entertainment services, namely, producing musical audio and video programs; distribution of musical and audio and video programs; music composition and transcription for others; song writing services; music publishing services; entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical artist, musical group or musical band; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by a musical artist, musical group and musical band; entertainment, namely, live music concerts; entertainment, namely, personal appearances by a musician, musical group, musical band, entertainer, actor or celebrity; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, and photographs; entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, commentary and articles about music, all online via a global computer network; providing a web site that features information on music, entertainment, television, film, games, and the arts; production of television and radio programs; radio entertainment production; motion picture film production; entertainment in the nature of on-going television, cable television and radio programs featuring music, beauty, fashion, modeling, comedy, dramatic acts, and spoken word; entertainment services, namely, providing television and cable television programs featuring music, entertainment, fashion, beauty, comedy, drama, dramedy, and spoken word; providing a variety show distributed over television, cable television, radio, satellite, audio and video media; entertainment, namely, a continuing variety and musical show broadcast over television, satellite, the internet, audio and video media; entertainment in the nature of theater production; entertainment in the nature of traveling tours featuring music, drama, and spoken word; entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game; providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users; amusement parks and centers; amusement arcades; children's entertainment and amusement centers, namely, interactive play areas; entertainment in the nature of an amusement park ride; entertainment services in the nature of an amusement park attraction, namely, a themed area; entertainment services in the nature of an amusement park show | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |