USPTO serial 86029967
PARTYBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TARCU, CATHERINE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARTYBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement, promotion and marketing services for electronic media, television, radio or music publishing content over the internet, television and other mediums excluding branded parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMY FORESTER
- Other trademarks owned by Atal Sports Technologies
- Other trademarks owned by Atal Sports Technologies
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PARTYBOX
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |