USPTO serial 86034062
GB2C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GB2C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam D. Resnick
ADAM D. RESNICK MOSAIC LEGAL GROUP, PLLC5185 MACARTHUR BLVD NW STE 350WASHINGTON, DC 20016-3353UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Outsourcing services for others in the field of e-commerce, namely, providing business program management, product advertising and marketing campaign management; outsourcing services for others in the field of e-commerce, namely, providing computerized online ordering services featuring general consumer merchandise, order management, namely, order fulfillment services and business operation and management of a distribution center or warehouse facility containing mail order, online order, or distribution inventory, business risk management; business consulting services in the field of program management, product and campaign management, e-commerce, order management, facilities management, security and risk management; personnel management consulting; human resources management services; website optimization; outsourcing services for others in the field of security management; outsourcing services for others in the field of e-commerce, namely, providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions | ACTIVE | Jun 14, 2013 |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of information technology, managed computer security services, computer and IT infrastructure services in the nature of IT infrastructure design, enterprise computing and data storage services, information security, namely, design and development of electronic data security systems, cloud computing, cloud hosting and management; Managed service provider (MSP) and application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and websites for others; Computer services related to website architecture, namely, planning, design, and implementation of websites for others; website content, namely, creating, modifying, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet content of the websites of others; website design, website development and testing, website analytics, namely, website usability testing services and collecting, editing, organizing, modifying, reporting, storing and sharing information related to website traffic, e-commerce transactions and marketing campaigns conducted via the Internet; website security, namely, development of security systems and contingency planning for websites, website accessibility, namely, installation and maintenance of website access software, monitoring of websites by remote access to ensure proper functioning, website load testing services; testing, analysis, and evaluation of computer hardware and software to assure compliance with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act; Computer services related to on-line fraud detection and prevention, namely, maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; computer services related to information security management, namely, development of security systems and contingency planning for information systems; computer services related to network security management, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; computer security consultancy; computer services, namely, providing website and network security management by restricting access to computer networks and websites; and computer services for protecting and securing websites, namely, scanning and penetration testing of computers, networks and websites to assess the information security vulnerability of websites | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services, namely, providing security assessments of physical locations, information systems, and working environments; online fraud detection and prevention services in the field of e-commerce and financial services; providing risk and security assessments for others, namely, providing risk and security assessments in the nature of investigation of assets, credit reports, fiscal assessments, and collection reports for security purposes; professional consultancy relating to security; Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; Monitoring of security systems; computer fraud detection services related to on-line fraud detection and prevention, namely, on-line fraud detection services and computerized security services in the nature of electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns indicating on-line fraud | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CGI Federal Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CGI Federal Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named GB2C
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |