Drawing for TRAPD

USPTO serial 86034935

TRAPD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAPD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ashly Boesche

ASHLY BOESCHE PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY HILLIARD & GERALDSON200 S WACKER DR STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-5896UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of forensic marking products, crime prevention and reduction and home and property security; Training services in the field of fields of forensic marking products and home and property security; Publication of education materials, namely, books, magazines, brochures, and flyers; Publication of training materials, namely, books, magazines, brochures, and flyers; consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—
045Legal services; Security threat analysis for protecting personal property and individuals; Personal security consultation; Business security consultation; Identification verification services, namely, providing identification marking with chemical solutions; provision of security information, namely, in the field of personal and physical security; Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via biological markers for the purposes of identifying personnel and property; Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via biometric markers for the purposes of identifying personnel and physical property; Computerized security services, namely, electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting suspicious and abnormal patterns of point of sale activity indicating theft, fraud, or other criminal activity for business establishments; Computerized security services, namely, electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on criminal activity for domestic establishments; Crime prevention advisory services, namely, providing advice on forensic technology to deter theft, fraud and other criminal activity; Crime prevention consultancy services, namely, in the field of forensic technology to deter theft, fraud and other criminal activity; Forensic advice for criminal investigations, namely, examination of fingerprints and handwriting for the purpose of forensic scientific intelligence, consultancy services relating to the aforementioned services; and Forensic analysis of chemical solutions containing unique forensic coding markers used by law enforcementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 21, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2013AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance