USPTO serial 86034991
WOOT FROOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOOT FROOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Miller
Mark D. Miller Sierra IP Law, PCP.O. Box 5637Fresno, CA 93755-5637UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sorbets, ice cream, freezer pop, frozen yogurt, and gelato with a fruit and vegetable base with or without flavor added; Fruit or vegetable based candies or mints, with or without additional flavors, both natural and artificial | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit and vegetable drinks with or without flavor added; Fruit and vegetable water with or without flavor and with or without carbonation; fruit juice and juice based concentrates of fruits, with or without flavor added; vegetable juices and vegetable juice concentrates, with or without flavor added | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Fruit-based alcoholic beverages, with or without flavor added | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fresh Fruit Cuts
- Other trademarks owned by Fresh Fruit Cuts
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named WOOT FROOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 10, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |