Drawing for HIFI

USPTO serial 86035648

HIFI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAL, KAMAL SINGH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HIFI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pam Kohli Jacobson

Pam Kohli Jacobson K&L Gates LLP925 4th Ave.Ste. 2900Seattle, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing a computer database, by means of a global computer network, in the field of literacy and early literacy skills that includes a collection of word-level and audio data and provides for the interactive exchange of this data for testing, teaching, monitoring and assessment purposesACTIVEJun 9, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 3, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 3, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 27, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance