USPTO serial 86036022
SEALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick L. Tolhurst
FREDERICK L. TOLHURST COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C.625 LIBERTY AVE FL 7PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-3152UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Navigation and marine safety warning lights, namely, strobes, rotating lights and bar lights, marking and signalling buoys, rotating lighting, signalling whistles, beacon lights, marine navigation aids, marine lanterns, marine buoys, offshore navaids, bridge lights, barge lights, leading lights, remote area lighting, lighthouse lights and apparatus; batteries; batteries for lighting; flashing and steady safety lights; luminous beacons for safety or warning purposes; safety markers; signalling equipment, apparatus and instruments, namely, marking and signalling buoys, rotating lighting, signalling whistles, beacon lights, marine navigation aids, marine lanterns, marine buoys, offshore navaids, bridge lights, barge lights, leading lights, remote area lighting, lighthouse lights and apparatus; monitoring and control systems for signalling equipment, apparatus and instruments; power supplies for signalling equipment, apparatus and instruments; calculators and calculating machines; mooring systems and equipment for marking and signalling buoys, namely calculators and calculating machines; accessories for all of the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |