Drawing for SMART COMMUNITY

USPTO serial 86036342

SMART COMMUNITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EBAUGH, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART COMMUNITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kazuyo Morita

Kazuyo Morita HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Silicon chips; computer programs for use in collecting, managing, analyzing, storing, sharing, and comparing medical information, patient records, and patient data; electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, digital transmitters and receivers for use in transmitting and receiving data; electronic database for use in collecting, managing, analyzing, storing, sharing, and comparing medical information, patient records, and patient data recorded on computer mediaACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs for use in collecting, managing, analyzing, storing, sharing, and comparing medical information, patient records, and patient data; Providing a database for use in collecting, managing, analyzing, storing, sharing, and comparing medical information, patient records, and patient data for use by medical professionals for medical research purposesACTIVE—
044Providing medical information, consultancy and advisory services; Maintaining patient medical records and files; collecting, analyzing, sharing, and comparing medical information, patient records, and patient data for the purpose of assisting medical professionals in monitoring, treating, and diagnosing patients; providing medical informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 6, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 27, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 25, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 9, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 23, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 22, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance