USPTO serial 86036885
NOW CFO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2016
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with NOW CFO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OUTSOURCED ASSOCIATES & STAFFING, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT, US
Other trademarks owned by OUTSOURCED ASSOCIATES & STAFFING, LLC
Murray, UT, US
Salt Lake City, UT, US
SALT LAKE CITY, UT, US
Murray, UT, US
MURRAY, UT, US
MURRAY, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Neville
210 N 2100 WSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business assistance, advisory and consulting services in the field of financial statement preparation and analysis, financial forecasting, accounting, budget planning, and cash flow modeling | ACTIVE | Jan 28, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OUTSOURCED ASSOCIATES & STAFFING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NOW CFO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NOW CFO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NOW CFO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NOW CFO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JBCB HOLDING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JBGB HOLDING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named NOW CFO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |