USPTO serial 86038355
Serial No. 86038355
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 86038355?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
SALLY M. ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CENTER801 CALIFORNIA STREETMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for information and data integration, analysis, management, collaboration, algorithmic and human-driven exploration, viewing, modeling, exporting, visualization, organization, modification, book marking, transmission, storage, exchange, sharing, querying, auditing, collection, editing, hosting, security, and tracking of data and information, the foregoing software also recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation; Computer hardware and software design; Computer programming services for information and data integration, analysis, management, collaboration, algorithmic and human-driven exploration, viewing, modeling, exporting, visualization, organization, modification, book marking, transmission, storage, exchange, sharing, querying, auditing, collection, editing, hosting, security, and tracking of data and information; Computer security consultancy; Computer software consulting; Computer software design for others; Computer systems analysis; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Information technology consulting services; Maintenance of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use of information technology consultation; Technical support services, namely, technical administration of servers for others and troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing server problems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |