USPTO serial 86038691
PONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2020
- Examiner
- DIBLE, JONATHON I
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
Timothy D. Pecsenye Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic mail and messaging services; electronic transmission of mail and messages; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; electronic messaging | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2019 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in electronic mail and messaging services; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that brokers electronic mail and messages between multiple users; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that enables a user to send electronic mail or an electronic message that predetermines and limits how the recipient may respond; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that sends automated electronic mail and electronic messages; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for sending, receiving, and responding to electronic mail and electronic messages; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that enables users to build workflows by sending, receiving, and responding to electronic mail and electronic messages | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Criterion Advisory, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by PONGPRO LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PONGPRO LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PONG LABS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CRITERION 360, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PONG LABS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CRITERION 360, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PONG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |