USPTO serial 86041106
STAND TALL WITH TOO TALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAND TALL WITH TOO TALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmers Branch, TX
Farmers Branch, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terica Smith
423 N HIGHLAND AVEJACKSON, TN 38301-5247UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cocktail glasses; Coffee cups; Coffee cups, tea cups and mugs; Coffee mugs; Cups and mugs; Drinking cups; Drinking cups and saucers; Drinking cups for babies and children and parts and fittings therefor, namely, cups for babies and children sold as a unit with valves and lids; Drinking cups for children and parts and fittings therefor, namely, drinking cups for children sold as a unit with non-insulated lids; Drinking cups for infants and parts and fittings therefor, namely, valves and lids sold as a unit; Drinking cups sold with lids therefor; Drinking glasses; Drinking glasses, namely, tumblers; Empty water bottles for bicycles; Glass mugs; Mugs; Plastic water bottle holders and attached carabiner clip sold as a unit; Plastic water bottles sold empty; Sports bottles sold empty; Water bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | American football bibs; Athletic shoes; Baseball caps and hats; Beach shoes; Belts made from imitation leather; Belts made of leather; Boat shoes; Bomber jackets; Button down shirts; Canvas shoes; Cleats for attachment to sports shoes; Denim jackets; European football bibs; Football boots; Football boots and studs therefor; Football shoes; Golf shoes; Hats; Hooded sweat shirts; Infants' shoes and boots; Jeans; Leather belts; Leather coats; Leather jackets; Leather shoes; Leisure shoes; Men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Running shoes; Sandals and beach shoes; Shoes; Sports shoes; Sweat jackets; Tennis shoes; Training shoes; Women's shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Belt buckles; Belt buckles; Belt clasps; Buckles for clothing; Clothing buckles | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Body protectors for football; Football body protectors; Football chest pads; Football elbow pads; Football girdles; Football gloves; Football knee pads; Football leg pads; Football or soccer goals; Football shoulder pads; Footballs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Too Tall 72 Collection
- Other trademarks owned by Too Tall 72 Collection
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named STAND TALL WITH TOO TALL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |