USPTO serial 86042112
SNEAKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNEAKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Nut butter substitutes made from peas; jams; jellies; prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, cheese or vegetables; processed vegetable and bean food bars, namely, snack bars made primarily of vegetables or beans; processed fruit-based food bars, namely, snack bars made primarily of fruit; protein-based, nutrient-dense snack bars; bean-based snack foods; fruit-based snack foods; nut-based snack foods; vegetable-based snack foods; potato-based snack foods; dairy-based beverages; dairy alternative-based beverages, namely, soy-based food beverage for use as a milk substitute; dairy alternative-based beverages, namely, almond-based milk for use as a milk substitute; dairy alternative-based beverages, namely, coconut-based beverages used as a milk substitute; fruit-based food beverages; vegetable-based food beverages; meat-based snack foods; prepared and frozen breakfast entrees consisting primarily of meat, eggs, bacon, potato pancakes, fried potatoes, ham, sausages, vegetables or fruits; apple puree; fruit puree; fruit purees used as ingredients of foods; fruit purees used as ingredients of beverages; tomato puree; vegetable puree; frozen or refrigerated hot dogs; hummus; meatballs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sauces; tomato sauce; pasta sauce; prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta; bakery products, namely, breads, sweet bakery goods and bakery desserts; processed cereals; ready-to-eat cereals; sandwiches; grain-based snack bars; cereal-based snack foods; corn-based snack foods; grain-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; prepared and frozen breakfast entrees consisting primarily of breakfast sandwiches, breakfast burritos, pancakes, French toast, or waffles; ice cream; cocoa-based beverages; snack bars made primarily of processed oats; snack bars made primarily of processed grains; frozen confections; frozen confections, namely, freezer bars; cookies; popcorn; crackers; pancake mixes; waffle mixes; brownie mixes; cookie mixes; pizza; dipping sauces; pasta; dry pasta; hamburger sandwiches, namely, sliders; dinner kits consisting primarily of taco shells, taco sauce and taco seasoning; pasta dinner kits consisting primarily of pasta noodles and pasta sauce; chicken tender kits consisting primarily of coatings for foods made of breading, dipping sauce and chicken seasoning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2015 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |