USPTO serial 86042151
BUD FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUD FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abbotsford, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl E. Gustafson
KARL E. GUSTAFSON MCMILLAN LLP1500-1055 West Georgia StreetPO Box 11117, Royal CentreVancouver, BC, V6E4N7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Plant nutrients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |