Drawing for FELIX STUDIO

USPTO serial 86043135

FELIX STUDIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FELIX STUDIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John G. Tutunjian

John G. Tutunjian Tutunjian & Bitetto, O.C.425 Broadhollow RoadSuite 302Melville, NY 11474

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Neoprene insulating sleeve for holding bottles, thermal insulated bags and containers for food and beverages; thermal insulated bags with shock resistant properties for carrying wine bottles and other glass bottles containing beverages; wine bottle cradles; thermally insulated wrap for cans to keep contents cold or hot; containers not of precious metal for household or kitchen use; neoprene bottle holders; insulating neoprene sleeve holders for beverage cans; thermal insulated lunch bags, lunch boxes, lunch pails; thermal insulated wraps for containers and bottles to keep contents therein cold or hot; portable beverage coolers; and household utensils, namely, corkscrews, strainers, spatulas, gratersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 7, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 14, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 31, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance