Drawing for BUILDING THE WORLD'S BEST SPECIALTY MATERIALS COMPANY

USPTO serial 86043514

BUILDING THE WORLD'S BEST SPECIALTY MATERIALS COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILDING THE WORLD'S BEST SPECIALTY MATERIALS COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Viccaro

PATRICK J. VICCARO ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED1000 SIX PPG PLPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, brochures, booklets, pamphlets, and promotional materials in the field of specialty metals, metallics, and materialsACTIVE—
040Manufacturing and production services for others in the field of specialty metals, metallics, and materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 13, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 21, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 9, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance