USPTO serial 86047756
FUNCTIONAL HEALING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUNCTIONAL HEALING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reykjavik, IS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kit M. Stetina, Esq.
KIT M. STETINA, ESQ. STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ORTHOPEDIC BRACES, NAMELY, KNEE BRACES, ANKLE BRACES AND SUPPORTS, CERVICAL COLLARS AND LUMBAR SUPPORTS | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | EXNI | EXPARTE APPEAL TO BOARD NOT ENTERTAINED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |