Drawing for XIMM

USPTO serial 86051469

XIMM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with XIMM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda Katzenstein

Amanda Katzenstein Polsinelli PCThree Embarcadero CenterSuite 1350San Francisco, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer hardware comprised of data processors, memories and programmable computer chips or electronic circuits in the nature of FPGAs or field-programmable gate arrays used for heterogeneous computing and accelerated big data processing for creating cooperative-computer acceleration architecture for preserving compatibility with established commodity architectures and software systems; computer hardware used for creating a multi-level hierarchy for computing and memoryACTIVEMar 2, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 17, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 17, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 17, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance