USPTO serial 86051645
Serial No. 86051645
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 86051645?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Weinstein
695 S COLORADO BLVD STE 360DENVER, CO 80246-8094UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | hand held stainless steel and titanium surgical instruments, namely, operating scissors, general surgery scissors, bandage scissors, hemostats, towel clamps, tube occluding clamps, scalpel handles, sponge forceps, sterilizing trays, stainless steel hollow ware, namely, sponge bowls, sterilizing pans and lids for pans, mayo instrument tray, emesis basin, iodine cup, medicine cup, and forceps, jar, forceps holders, sterilizing instruments, namely, sterilizing and three-prong sterilizing forceps, needle holders, suture clip appliers, ligature carriers, dressing and tissue forceps, intestinal clamps, gall bladder probes, gall bladder scoops, gall duct clamps, vein strippers, suction tubes, trocars, malletts, surgical loupes, grooved directors, probes, dermal punches, comedone extractors, finger retractors, flexible shaft retractors, hand retractors, self retaining retractors, rake retractors, hooks, skin retractors, abdominal retractors, vaginal speculums, plaster cast instruments, bone holding clamps, bone reduction clamps, bone retractors, orthopedic rongeurs, bone curettes, bone cutters, orthopedic chisels, orthopedic ostetomes, orthopedic gouges, periosteal elevators, orthopedic raspatories, orthopedic saws, cartilage and tendon clamps, orthopedic drills, pin cutters, vice grips, micro surgical scissors, hemostats, forceps, needle holders, bayonet forceps, micro surgical vessel hooks, laminectomy rongeurs, disc rongeurs, bipolar forceps, monopolar forceps, dura hooks, knives end elevators, nerve and vein retractors, brain suction tubes, spoons and spatulas, pituitary curettes, cranial drills, neuro clips and appliers, rib retractors, rib shears, thoracic clamps and forceps, auricle clamps, vena cava clamps, coronary artery scissors, aortic punch, eye needle holders, scissors forceps, hooks, spatulas, probe scissors, tonometers, ear specula, allifator ear forceps, tuning forks, ear curettes, knife guide and instrument guide probes, cilia forceps, mastoid instruments, namely, alexander mastoid chisels, alexander mastoid gouges, andrew mastoid chisels, andrew mastoid gouges, and kerrison mastoid rongeur, adenoid curettes, adenetomes, mouth gags, uvula retractor, adenoid punches, tonsil seizing forceps, tonsil snares, endoscopic forceps, rectal speculums, rectal biopsy instruments, pro- static retractors, kidney stone forceps, urethreal sounds and dilators, vaginal sounds and dilators, uterine curettes, uterine biopsy, uterine tenaculums, polyp forceps, hysterectomy forceps, placenta forceps, circumcision clamps, obstetrical forceps, extraction pliers | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |