Drawing for M C

USPTO serial 86052816

M C

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M C?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaPO Box 230692New York, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Baking ovens; broiling pans; combination steamers and ovens; electric appliances for making yoghurt; electric coffee makers; electric cooking ovens; electric cooking pots; electric cookware, namely, broilers; electric cookware, namely, roasters; electric food dehydrators; electric food steamer; electric food warmers; electric frying pans; electric rice steamer; electric vegetable steamer; barbecue grills; bread baking machines; cooking ovens; cooking ranges; electric deep fryers; electric cooking pots; electric hot plates; electric panini makers; electric popcorn poppers; electric slow cookers; ovens for sous vide cooking; cookware, namely, electric temperature controlled sous vide oven with built-in water bathACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance