Drawing for FETCH-IT

USPTO serial 86053061

FETCH-IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FETCH-IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

JAY BEGLER NIESAR & VESTAL LLP90 NEW MONTGOMERY ST FL 9SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for modifying the appearance and enabling transmission of images, videos, text and audio-visual content utilizing geolocation; computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) to utilize geolocation based information and content; computer software in the nature of an application programming interface (API) which facilitates online services for social networking, building social networking applications and for allowing data retrieval, upload, download, access and management; computer software to enable capturing, producing, encoding, editing, mixing, modifying, uploading, downloading, organizing, managing, storing, searching, indexing, posting, synchronizing, displaying, tagging, streaming, linking, sharing, sending or providing electronic media or information via computer or other communication networks, all of the foregoing excluding goods relating to making, displaying or sharing electronic sticky notesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 23, 2016CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 22, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 7, 2016EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2016PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 11, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance