USPTO serial 86054079
IT'S FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT'S FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald A DiCerbo
RONALD A DICERBO MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY500 W MADISON34th FloorCHICAGO, IL 60661-4584Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Bags, boxes, cartons, storage containers, and packaging containers made of plastic coated with minerals and clay, chromophores, or transition metal complexes for general industrial and commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Boxes, cartons, and storage containers made of plastic coated with minerals and clay, chromophores, or transition metal complexes for general household use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by It's Fresh Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by It's Fresh Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named IT'S FRESH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |