USPTO serial 86054259
MOTEAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTEAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham
John C. Stringham WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring financial interchange computer software platforms for facilitating a full suite of mobile, digital loyalty and financial transactions and services through mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internet, namely, mobile banking, mobile money transfers, check cashing, ACH services, issuing prepaid debit cards, mobile prepaid airtime services in the nature of transferring airtime, namely, telecommunications air time brokerage services for use by others and making payments for adding airtime to prepaid or pay-as-you-go wireless services, electronic funds transfer, electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data, electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data, electronic credit and debit transaction processing, processing payments to third parties and bill payment services, mobile purchasing, namely, providing electronic processing of credit/debit card transactions and electronic payments via mobile phone for allowing consumers to purchase goods and services of others, mobile multichannel payments, namely, bill payment services and loan payment services; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for financial services, in the nature of stored-value cash or debit card services, namely, loading, managing, and payment processing, provided by mobile telephone connections, interactive voice response over telephone connections, retail point-of-sale connections and the internet; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for processing of redemption services based on consumer transaction behavior, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by issuing coupons, rewards, discounts and promotions which may then be redeemed when purchasing goods or services; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for processing of pricing comparisons for goods and services and promotional and marketing information and offers via mobile electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |