Drawing for OLIVE & MINT

USPTO serial 86054432

OLIVE & MINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIVE & MINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ashley Mayya

Ashley Mayya Ashley Mayya Law8117 Preston RoadSuite 300Dallas, TX 75225

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring interactive games, toys, and giftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 9, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 9, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 25, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance