Drawing for HAIR IQ

USPTO serial 86054478

HAIR IQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAIR IQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa W. Rosaya

LISA W. ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP452 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10018-2706UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Research in the field of hair care in the nature of providing examination of the hair to identify strengths and weaknesses and recommend appropriate hair care productsABANDONED—
044Beauty consultation services, namely, providing examination of the hair to identify strengths and weaknesses and recommend appropriate hair care products; Services for the care of the hair, namely, hair cutting, hair colouring, hair salon services, hair styling and hairdressing servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2014MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2014ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance