USPTO serial 86056160
OVERWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OVERWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Little Rock, AR
North Little Rock, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie Fugitt
JAMIE FUGITT PPGMR Law PLLC101 Morgan Keegan Drive, Suite ALITTLE ROCK, AR 72202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Paintball guns and accessories, namely, gun mounts, armbands, wristbands, glasses, helmets and other wearable electronic devices that mount or hold mobile phones, handheld devices and computers, or replicate all or a portion of the display of mobile phones, handheld devices or computers; airsoft guns for recreational purposes and accessories, namely, gun mounts, armbands, wristbands, glasses, helmets and other wearable electronic devices that mount or hold mobile phones, handheld devices and computers, or replicate all or a portion of the display of mobile phones, handheld devices or computers; laser tag guns for recreational purposes and accessories, namely, gun mounts, armbands, wristbands, glasses, helmets and other wearable electronic devices that mount or hold mobile phones, handheld devices and computers, or replicate all or a portion of the display of mobile phones, handheld devices or computers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2015 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |