Drawing for NEXTFEST

USPTO serial 86057481

NEXTFEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXTFEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric E. Gisolfi

ERIC E. GISOLFI SABIN BERMANT & GOULD LLPOne World Trade CenterNEW YORK, NY 10007-2915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of festivals featuring technology information, music and food; Educational services, namely, classes, lectures, workshops showcasing cutting edge technology, consumer electronics, video games, audio and video components, household gadgets, office products; arranging and conducting educational conferences in the field of technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 12, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance