Drawing for XPRESSO ULTRA

USPTO serial 86057490

XPRESSO ULTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XPRESSO ULTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Whitelaw

JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 310NAPLES, FL 34103-3586UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Active electronic components and passive electronic components, namely, quartz crystals, microprocessor crystals, crystal filters, phased locked loops, frequency translators, frequency generating devices and frequency controlling devices; crystal clock oscillators; oscillators; temperature compensated crystal oscillators; voltage controlled crystal oscillators; oven controlled crystal oscillators; ceramic resonators; voltage controlled oscillators; application specific integrated circuits; integrated circuits; programmable integrated circuits; integrated circuit modules; BAW (bulk acoustic wave) resonators; BAW oscillators; SAW (surface acoustic wave) resonators; SAW oscillators; and software for running, programming and controlling all of the foregoing; semiconductor chips; semiconductor chips engineered to produce frequencies without mechanical movement or mechanical resonation; crystal free oscillatorsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of Active electronic components and passive electronic components, namely, quartz crystals, microprocessor crystals, crystal filters, phased locked loops, frequency translators, frequency generating devices and frequency controlling devices; crystal clock oscillators; oscillators; temperature compensated crystal oscillators; voltage controlled crystal oscillators; oven controlled crystal oscillators; ceramic resonators; voltage controlled oscillators; application specific integrated circuits; integrated circuits; programmable integrated circuits; integrated circuit modules; BAW (bulk acoustic wave) resonators; BAW oscillators; SAW (surface acoustic wave) resonators; SAW oscillators; and software for running, programming and controlling all of the foregoing; semiconductor chips; semiconductor chips engineered to produce frequencies without mechanical movement or mechanical resonation; crystal free oscillators; providing information on all of the foregoing via a global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 8, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2014INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 20, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2013MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance