USPTO serial 86057703
BONGACAMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BONGACAMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tallinn 10120, EE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Blattner
JOHN C. BLATTNER DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC350 S MAIN ST STE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104-2131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Message sending; computer aided transmission of messages and images; transmission of digital files; elecontric mail; teleconferencing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Videotaping; entertainment information; movie studios; videotape editing; providing on-line electronic publications, not downloadable; organization of competitions; arranging of beauty contests; videotape film production; amusements; photography; photographic reporting; production of shows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |