USPTO serial 86059806
OTHELLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 2016
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OTHELLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Taito-ku, Tokyo, JP
Taito-ku, Tokyo, JP
Chiyoda-ku, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
Bassam N. Ibrahim Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC1700 K St. N.W., Suite 300Washington, DC 20006-3807United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game programmes; computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; downloadable computer game programs; downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; downloadable electronic game programs; downloadable electronic game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; [ handheld computers, wireless devices, and handheld electronic devices; protective covers and cases for cell phones, laptops and portable media players; ] video and computer game programs; [ video game cartridges; video game cartridges and discs; ] video game software | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |