USPTO serial 86060248
DIGIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nederland, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; Computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; Computer hardware and computer peripherals; Computer hardware and peripheral devices; Computer hardware and peripheral devices and computer software for data communication and translating and transmitting data sold therewith; Computer hardware and peripherals; Computer hardware for wireless content delivery; Computer hardware for remotely controlling tablets, smartphones, and computers; Computer keyboard controllers; Computer keyboards; Computer peripheral apparatus; Computer peripheral devices; Computer peripheral equipment; Computer peripherals; Computer peripherals and parts thereof; Devices for wireless radio transmission; Electronic controllers for remotely controlling tablets, smartphones, and computers; Input devices for computers; Interfaces and peripheral devices for computers; Interfaces for computers; Programmable electronic controllers for remotely controlling tablets, smartphones, and computers; Remote control transmitter for radio-controlled devices; Remote controls for tablets, smartphones, and computers; User interfaces, namely, wireless remote controller for electrotechnical and electronic devices; Wireless adapters for computers; Wireless computer peripherals; Wireless controllers to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices; Wireless presenter in the nature of a wireless remote pointer; Wireless receivers and transmitters for portable media players; Wireless transmitters and receivers | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |