USPTO serial 86061160
CROWN 'N GLORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CROWN 'N GLORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Corona Del Mar, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Brainard
1003 S CATALINA AVE APT CREDONDO BEACH, CA 90277-4715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, claw clips; Hair accessories, namely, hair sticks; Hair accessories, namely, jaw clips; Hair accessories, namely, plastic styling inserts that create height and volume on the crown of the head; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair bands; Hair barrettes; Hair bows; Hair buckles; Hair clamps; Hair clips; Hair elastics; Hair extensions; Hair grips; Hair nets; Hair netting; Hair ornaments; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair pieces; Hair pieces and wigs; Hair pins and grips; Hair ribbons; Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |