CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WHOLESOME

USPTO serial 86061331

WHOLESOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHOLESOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ashley Robertson

ASHLEY ROBERTSON WEIR JOHNSON PLLC4925 Greenville AvenueSUITE 200DALLAS, TX 75206

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Almonds; slivered almonds; sliced almonds; brazil nuts; cashews; chestnuts; coconut products, namely, coconut oil and chips; hazelnuts; macadamia nuts; roasted mixed nuts; peanuts; pecans; pecan pieces; pine nuts; pistachios; soy products, namely, processed edamame, processed beans, and soy-based snack foods; sunflower seeds; walnuts; pili nuts; black walnuts; all nuts being processedACTIVE—
030Processed cacao products, namely, nibs, powder, beans, breakfast cereal, and nut butter, cacao covered cashews, cacao covered nuts, cacao covered mulberries, cacao paste, cacao covered almonds, cacao covered chocolate chip almonds, and cacao covered raisins; coconut products, namely, flour, palm sugar, and bon bonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 19, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance