USPTO serial 86061939
RETRO IMAGES INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RETRO IMAGES INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cedar Rapids, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Hoke
ROBERT W. HOKE NYEMASTER GOODE, P.C.625 1ST ST SE STE 400CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52401-2032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, action figure toys; toy arrows; hand-powered non-mechanical flying toy; inflatable ride-on toys; inflatable thin rubber toys; inflatable toys; inflatable toys showing decorative pictures; mechanical action toys; mechanical toys; miniature toy helmets; model toy steam engines; model toy vehicles; modeled plastic toy figurines; molded toy figures; music box toys; musical toys; non-electronic toy vehicles; non-riding transportation toys; plastic character toys; plastic toy hoops; play houses and toy accessories therefor; play mats for use with toy vehicles; playing pieces in the nature of miniature action figures and toy model vehicles for use with table top hobby battle games in the nature of battle, war and skirmish games, and fantasy games; positionable toy vehicles; pull toys; punching toys; push toys; PVC toy figures; racks and stands specifically designed to hold toy vehicles; radio controlled toy vehicles; radio transmitters for use with radio-controlled toys; rideable toy vehicles; rideable toys and accessories therefor; ride-on toys; ride-on toys and accessories therefor; role playing toys in the nature of play sets for children to imitate real life occupations; scale model kits; stacking toys; stands for rideable toys; tossing disc toys; toy action figures; toy action figures and accessories therefor; toy airplanes; toy and novelty face masks; toy animals; toy animals and accessories therefor; toy armor; toy bakeware and cookware; toy banks; toy boats; toy bows and arrows; toy boxes; toy building blocks; toy building blocks capable of interconnection; toy building structures and toy vehicle tracks; toy buildings and accessories therefor; toy butterfly nets; toy candy dispensers, toy cap pistols; toy cars; toy construction blocks; toy construction sets; toy figures; toy furniture; toy gliders; toy guns; toy harmonicas; toy holsters; toy hoop sets; toy houses; toy masks; toy model cars; toy model hobby craft kits for constructing toy model landscapes, scenery, and action figures; toy model hobbycraft kits; toy model kit cars; toy model train sets; toy modeling dough; toy music boxes; toy musical boxes; toy noisemakers; toy pirate hats; toy pistols; toy putty; toy robots; toy scooters; toy scooters and accessories therefor; toy sets of carpenters' tools; toy swords; toy tools; toy trains and parts and accessories therefor; toy vehicle track sets and roadways and accessories therefor; toy vehicles; toy vehicles and accessories therefor; toy weapons; toy whistles; toy xylophones; toys, namely, detonating caps; two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with other toys; water squirting toys; water toys; wind-up toys; and wind-up walking toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |