USPTO serial 86062033
JIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIONDA, LAURA ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher O Usrey
CHRISTOPHER O USREY VCOUNSEL5739 BELMONT AVEDALLAS, TX 75206-6801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer operating programs, computer software in the fields of health care, ambulatory care, managed care, and information technology in the fields of health care, ambulatory care and managed care which may downloaded from a global computer network computer software for population healthcare database management, computer software for use in the administration of medical management for health care plans and healthcare delivery organizations, computer software for health care plan management and administration, computer software to enable the provision of health care and insurance information; computer software for health care plan network management; computer software for benefits administration of health care plans; computer software for claims and benefits ??????????????????? administration for Medicare and Medicaid managed care and computer software and operating systems for health case management, health data profiling data mining, data access and reporting, scheduling, and decision support systems | ACTIVE | May 9, 2004 |
| 042 | Design, development and implementation of medical management software; installation, maintenance and repair of medical management computer software; application service provider (ASP) ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? featuring software for health care plan management and administration; implementation and maintenance of computer software; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; application service provider (ASP) featuring software to enable the provision of health care and insurance information; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for health care plan network management; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for benefits administration of health care plans; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for claims and benefits administration for Medicare and Medicaid managed care; computer software consultation and providing computer diagnostic services and inspections of computer networks; providing computer disaster recovery services, including planning, testing, and recovery of computer data; providing computer time-sharing services through a bureau; providing on-line batch computer services, namely, configuration of multiple files into a single group; designing, implementing, creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer services, namely, providing computer data recovery services; providing computer software design, testing and custom programming, and maintenance of software for others in the nature of updating software; computer systems analysis; computer design for others namely, computer systems design; providing computer consulting relating to computer architecture; providing computer communications in the nature of networking services, namely, providing integration of computer systems and computer networks; providing computer software product research and development services; providing information technology services; conducting feasibility studies in the field of new technologies; custom computer programming services for others, namely, database development, information retrieval services; providing data conversion services for of computer program data or information services; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a computer network; monitoring the computer systems of others for technological purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities services; providing testing facilities for computers, computer peripherals, computer networks and communications system; providing services for the remote or on-site monitoring of computer systems for technological purposes; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with health care information technology and software laws and regulations, namely, testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; providing electronic computer, network and software design services; providing health care information technology (IT) consulting services | ACTIVE | May 9, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |