Drawing for TWINKLETECH

USPTO serial 86062559

TWINKLETECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWINKLETECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Brown

Jeffrey H. Brown Michael Best & Friedrich LLP180 N STETSON AVE STE 2000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028artificial Christmas treesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 1, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance