Drawing for MPOWER

USPTO serial 86064279

MPOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MPOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles G. Zug

Charles G. Zug Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough Llp301 S. College St.Suite 2300, IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Cost analyses services in the field of modular nuclear power plants; business management consultation in the field of modular nuclear power plants; personnel management consultancy; compilation of information into computer databases; commercial administration of the licensing of modular nuclear power plant equipment and modular nuclear power plants of others; consulting in the field of the commercial administration of the licensing of modular nuclear power plant goods and services; consulting services for others for business purposes in the field of design, planning, and implementation of project management of modular nuclear power plantsACTIVE—
037Providing modular nuclear power plant services, namely, construction site consultation, construction, maintenance, repair, and renovation services for modular nuclear power plants; consulting services in the field of construction planning and construction project management of modular nuclear power plantsACTIVE—
042Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and project engineering of modular nuclear power plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 8, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 21, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 24, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2015DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance