USPTO serial 86064463
HOT LOOKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOT LOOKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Dougherty
LINDA M. DOUGHERTY KANE KESSLER, PC666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017-4041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body care products, namely, bath oils, bath and shower gels, bubble bath, bath crystals, bath grains, bath salts, soaps, body scrubs, body massage oils, body butter, fragrance sprays for the body, pedicure soaks, pedicure scrubs, non-medicated lip balm, body polish, body and foot scrub and non-medicated foot cream, exfoliating creams and exfoliating scrubs; Lotions, namely, body lotion, bath lotion, baby lotion, hair lotion, make-up removing lotions, skin cleansing lotion, face and body lotions, eye lotions, nail lotions, shaving lotion, after shave lotions, suntan lotions, after-sun lotions, lotions for strengthening the nails, lotions for cellulite reduction; Cosmetics and makeup, namely, compacts, lip primer, pads, pencils, mascara, eye shadow, foundation, face powder, rouge, lipsticks, lip gloss, lip liners, eyeliners; Perfume; Cologne; Nail care preparations, namely, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail enamel, nail conditioner; Artificial nails, namely, glue on nails, self-stick nails, and nail tips; Hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, hair creams, hairspray, thickening control creams, heat protection sprays, hair coloring and dyes, hair color chalk; Temporary tattoo transfers for use as cosmetics; Body art, namely, body art pens, body art stickers, body art glitter markers, and adhesive gems | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand held implements, namely, tweezers, eyelash curlers, manicure sticks, nail buffers, nail files, nail shapers, nail smoothers, nail clippers, nail scissors, manicure brush, cuticle trimmers, cuticle pushers, toenail clips, and toenail scissors | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair accessories, namely, hair combs, hair brushes; Cosmetic utensils and applicators, namely, cosmetic brushes, eyelash and eyebrow brushes and combs, facial sponges for applying makeup; Body scrubbing puffs; Bath brushes; Bath sponges and loofas; Facial cleansing sponges | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, twisters, claw clips, snap clips, jaw clips, hair sticks, plastic styling inserts, hair bands, hair elastics, hair scrunchies, hair ribbons, hair buckles, hair barrettes, hair clips, hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps; Hair extensions; Hair pieces and wigs; Electric hair rollers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Allstar Marketing Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Allstar Marketing Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named HOT LOOKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |