Drawing for AIRFLOWBABY

USPTO serial 86065456

AIRFLOWBABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRFLOWBABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael T. Olsen

MICHAEL T. OLSEN WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A.225 SOUTH SIXTH STREETCAPELLA TOWER, SUITE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4629

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Receiving blankets used as nursing coversACTIVE
025Clothing for babies, namely, baby layettes, baby caps, one-piece garments for babies, pajamas, jackets, shirts, pants, jumpers, baby dresses, T-shirts, coats, hats, baby underwear, baby bottoms; baby tops, one-piece garments for infants and toddlers, bodysuits, baby shoes, baby headwear, baby bibs not of paperACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 31, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 19, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2015ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Sep 3, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 26, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 6, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 8, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Sep 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance