Drawing for THE ROSE GARDEN

USPTO serial 86065748

THE ROSE GARDEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ROSE GARDEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 14, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 30, 2014RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 30, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 9, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 21, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance