Drawing for KLONDIKE BORDEAUX

USPTO serial 86067065

KLONDIKE BORDEAUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLONDIKE BORDEAUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy Ladle

JEREMY LADLE POTANDON PRODUCE L.L.C.1210 PIER VIEW DRIDAHO FALLS, ID 83402-4966UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh potatoesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 23, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Dec 22, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 22, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 29, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 23, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 6, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 15, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 20, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance