USPTO serial 86067428
CINEBOOKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINEBOOKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan Ko
Bryan Ko FUHU HOLDINGS, INC.909 N SEPULVEDA BLVD STE 540EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-2733UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic book readers; Computer application software for handheld digital electronic devices, namely, tablet computers and electronic book readers, namely, software for accessing movie-formatted, video-based or digital books; downloadable films and movies featuring fiction and non-fiction stories on a variety of topics provided via computer and communications networks; audio books in the nature of novels; digital book readers; Carrying cases, protective covers and stands specially adapted for use with handheld digital electronic devices, namely, tablet computers and electronic book readers; Power adapters; USB cables; Computer hardware; Downloadable multimedia files containing audio, visual, audiovisual, video featuring a variety of topics; Downloadable electronic publications featuring magazines, newspapers, periodicals, newsletters, journals and manuals on a variety of topics; Children's educational software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |