Drawing for NATIONWIDE PAYMENTS

USPTO serial 86067838

NATIONWIDE PAYMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NATIONWIDE PAYMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Lee Taylor

JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic paymentsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 17, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 18, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 6, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 22, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
May 22, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 22, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 22, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jan 11, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 19, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 13, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 18, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 6, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Aug 5, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance