USPTO serial 86068904
ABOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas S. Kidde
Thomas S. Kidde Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP221 N. Figueroa StreetSuite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Reference books in the field of agile project management | ABANDONED | Dec 21, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |