Drawing for ANARCHY WELDING

USPTO serial 86069519

ANARCHY WELDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANARCHY WELDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce M. Green

Bruce M. Green Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP601 West Cordova StreetSuite 480, The StationVancouver, BC, V6B1G1

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009protective and heat resistant clothing, namely, welding gloves; protective and heat resistant clothing for use in welding, namely, welding pants, shirts, jackets and helmetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 26, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance