Drawing for THE INNERVIEWER

USPTO serial 86072150

THE INNERVIEWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE INNERVIEWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Drew Alia, Esq.

DREW ALIA, ESQ. IP Global Law Firm, PC1518 Walnut Street,15th Fl, Suite 1506Philadelphia, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about inspirational personal events accessible by means of radio, television, satellite, audio, video, web-based applications, mobile phone applications, computer networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 4, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 30, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 22, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 23, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 23, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 3, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 1, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Sep 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance