USPTO serial 86074618
WIN EVERY ATTACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIN EVERY ATTACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica L. Dias
MONICA L. DIAS FROST BROWN TODD LLC301 E 4TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4245UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology (IT) security services, namely, computer consultation in the field of computer and network security and in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Information technology (IT) security services, namely, computer services that provide online scanning, detecting, quarantining, and eliminating of viruses, worms, Trojans, spyware, adware, malware, and unauthorized data and programs on computers, networks, and electronic devices; Information technology (IT) security services, namely, computer network management services, namely, managing the computer networks of others to provide protection from computer network intrusions in connection with computer network security systems; Information technology (IT) security services, namely, technical support services in the field of computer network security, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, and identifying technical solutions for computer network security problems; Computer services, namely, management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, management of information technology (IT) security for others, namely, managing the computer networks of others to provide protection from computer network intrusions, to detect computer network intrusions, to alert the customer as to computer network intrusions, to respond to computer network intrusions, to eliminate computer network intrusions, and to prevent computer network intrusions, all in connection with computer network security systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in protecting and maintaining information technology security and in responding to and preventing breaches of information technology security | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; Computer security services, namely, monitoring the security status of computer networks and generating security responses based on network intrusion alerts; Providing methods and procedures for the management of computer and network threats, namely, surveillance and monitoring of security problems and vulnerabilities in computer hardware, networks, and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MORPHICK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cincinnati Bell Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cincinnati Bell Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named WIN EVERY ATTACK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |