Drawing for NDNA

USPTO serial 86075369

NDNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NDNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. McElwaine

JOHN C. MCELWAINE NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP100 N TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software platform for facilitating electronic payments, financial transaction processing services, secure commercial transactions and payment options, and providing online electronic financial transaction services and information in the nature of payment transaction data and account usageACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for facilitating electronic payments, financial transaction processing services, secure commercial transactions and payment options, and providing online electronic financial transaction services and information in the nature of payment transaction data and account usageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 7, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 26, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 9, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 7, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 10, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 27, 2014LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 17, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance