Drawing for CROW CRUNCH

USPTO serial 86075736

CROW CRUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROW CRUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zaneta M. Robinson

ZANETA M. ROBINSON BLANCO TACKABERY & MATAMOROS, P.A.PO BOX 25008WINSTON SALEM, NC 27114-5008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029chicharron; pork rinds; meat based snack foodsACTIVE—
030wheat based snack foods; grain based snack foods; churrosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance