Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 86075950?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/86075950. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns KLEER ADHESIVES?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 86075950, the listed owner(s) include: TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

What is USPTO serial number 86075950?

Serial number 86075950 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark KLEER ADHESIVES. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of KLEER ADHESIVES?

KLEER ADHESIVES (86075950) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover KLEER ADHESIVES?

The public record lists International Classes: 001, 019. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 86075950

KLEER ADHESIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 26, 2013
Status date: Aug 10, 2017
Registration date: —
Examiner: HACK, ANDREA R
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLEER ADHESIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Wixom, MI
Other trademarks owned by TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean Collin

STACI R DEREGNAUCOURT QUINN LAW GROUP PLLC39555 ORCHARD HILL PLACESUITE 520NOVI, MI 48375-5526

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
001	Adhesives for the building construction industry, namely, the bonding of PVC building materials; industrial adhesives for coating and sealing of PVC building materials, all of the foregoing curing optically opaque, color-matched, or otherwise non-transparent	ACTIVE	Sep 30, 2010
019	Adhesive mortar for building purposes, namely, the bonding, coating, and sealing of PVC building materials, all of the foregoing curing optically opaque, color-matched, or otherwise non-transparent	ACTIVE	Sep 30, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 10, 2017	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 10, 2017	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 10, 2017	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Apr 28, 2017	EXAR	EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART	—
Nov 1, 2016	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 27, 2016	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jul 27, 2016	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jul 27, 2016	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jun 6, 2016	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 1, 2016	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Apr 1, 2016	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Apr 1, 2016	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Mar 9, 2016	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 9, 2016	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 1, 2016	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Mar 1, 2016	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Mar 1, 2016	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Mar 1, 2016	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 7, 2016	AAUA	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED	—
Jan 6, 2016	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Dec 18, 2015	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Dec 18, 2015	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Dec 18, 2015	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 4, 2015	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Sep 10, 2015	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Sep 10, 2015	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2015	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2015	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Aug 20, 2015	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 20, 2015	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 20, 2015	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2015	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Mar 4, 2015	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2015	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 6, 2015	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 6, 2015	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2014	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2014	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2014	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2014	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 16, 2014	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 16, 2014	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2014	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2014	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2014	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2014	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 9, 2013	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED	—
Oct 8, 2013	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Sep 30, 2013	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—